DiscoverKitecastAI and Third-Party Security "Danger Zone": 2025 Annual Data Security and Compliance Risk Report
AI and Third-Party Security "Danger Zone": 2025 Annual Data Security and Compliance Risk Report

AI and Third-Party Security "Danger Zone": 2025 Annual Data Security and Compliance Risk Report

Update: 2025-09-05
Share

Description

Cybersecurity experts Heather Noggle and Dr. Arun DeSouza discussed Kiteworks' Data Security and Compliance Risk: 2025 Annual Survey Report, which introduces the industry's first quantitative risk scoring algorithm. The comprehensive study of 461 organizations reveals that 46% now operate in high- to critical-risk territory, with the median enterprise scoring 4.84 on a 10-point scale—dangerously close to the high-risk threshold of 5.0.

The experts analyzed a counterintuitive finding about third-party risk management: Organizations managing 1,001-5,000 external partners face the highest security risk (average score 5.19), surpassing enterprises with over 5,000 third-party relationships. Dr. DeSouza explained this "danger zone" phenomenon: "By nature, managing over 5,000 means you're a much bigger organization with more resources ... Many times you've got a platform-based approach." These larger enterprises can monitor risks in real time, while mid-sized partner ecosystems struggle with enterprise-level complexity on mid-market budgets—resulting in 24% experiencing 7+ annual security incidents.

Industry-specific findings revealed surprising risk disparities. Energy topped the risk charts due to legacy IoT devices and 30-year-old technologies vulnerable to exploitation. Technology ranked second, which Noggle attributed to the "overconfidence factor" and rapid employee turnover. "Tech companies are losing people so fast, they want to implement things so fast. That to me is a perfect storm," DeSouza noted. Conversely, heavily regulated sectors like life sciences demonstrated lower risk scores due to compliance-driven security investments.

The report exposed a dangerous "confidence paradox" where organizations claiming to be "somewhat confident" in data governance showed 19% higher risk scores than those acknowledging uncertainty. "Without governance you can't manage," Noggle emphasized, adding that overconfidence breeds complacency in rapidly evolving threat landscapes.

AI governance emerged as a critical vulnerability. While 64% of enterprises track AI-generated content (up from 28% in 2024), only 17% have deployed technical governance frameworks. The stakes are high—the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report found that 97% of AI-related breaches lacked proper controls, with AI breaches costing $670,000 more than average. DeSouza warned about inherited risks like "Echo Leak," a zero-click vulnerability exploiting AI's use of historical data, demonstrating that organizations must secure not just AI models but their entire operational environment.

Poor data visibility creates cascading failures: Organizations unable to count their third parties showed 46% correlation with unknown breach frequency, while 31% of those with 5,000+ partners take over 90 days to detect breaches. As Noggle noted, "If we're back at identify and we're at detect, detect should not be that difficult if identify is done well."

Heather Noggle LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathernoggle/ 

Arun DeSouza LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/arundesouza/ 

Check out video versions of Kitecast episodes at https://www.kiteworks.com/kitecast or on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/c/KiteworksCGCP.

Comments 
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

AI and Third-Party Security "Danger Zone": 2025 Annual Data Security and Compliance Risk Report

AI and Third-Party Security "Danger Zone": 2025 Annual Data Security and Compliance Risk Report

Tim Freestone and Patrick Spencer